Jeanne and Maggie sitting on the open tailgate of our Element (whichJeanne insists on naming "Ellie").
Jeanne and Maggie sitting on the open tailgate of our Element (whichJeanne insists on naming "Ellie").
All three of us, Jeanne, Maggie and i, got henna tattoos to enjoy forour two weeks on vacation. Fun stuff.
All three of us, Jeanne, Maggie and i, got henna tattoos to enjoy forour two weeks on vacation. Fun stuff.
Loving using the Element to drive to Cannon Beach Christian ConferenceCenter. Maggie seemingly loved it too. :)
Loving using the Element to drive to Cannon Beach Christian ConferenceCenter. Maggie seemingly loved it too. :)
Ranking Languages: Fear as a Career Move is a great article tackling how to determine programming language choices in the context of your employability as a programmer. Excellent. I really love when he asks "Is the most popular language the best for your career." That's kind of the unspoken assumption. But is it really?
Ranking Languages: Fear as a Career Move is a great article tackling how to determine programming language choices in the context of your employability as a programmer. Excellent. I really love when he asks "Is the most popular language the best for your career." That's kind of the unspoken assumption. But is it really?
Cool! Benjamin Pollack posted a brillant piece describing the value of the REPL, the "Read-Eval-Print-Loop" that makes environments like Smalltalk, Python and Ruby so absolutely superior to the typical "Code-Compile-Test-Debug" cycle of other tools. Good read.
Oh! And I found it via a nice bit that says Dynamic languages work closer to how you design software. Also a nice read with some solid backing for an assumption I've long held.
Oh! And I found it via a nice bit that says Dynamic languages work closer to how you design software. Also a nice read with some solid backing for an assumption I've long held.
Cool! Benjamin Pollack posted a brillant piece describing the value of the REPL, the "Read-Eval-Print-Loop" that makes environments like Smalltalk, Python and Ruby so absolutely superior to the typical "Code-Compile-Test-Debug" cycle of other tools. Good read.
Oh! And I found it via a nice bit that says Dynamic languages work closer to how you design software. Also a nice read with some solid backing for an assumption I've long held.
Oh! And I found it via a nice bit that says Dynamic languages work closer to how you design software. Also a nice read with some solid backing for an assumption I've long held.
